Thursday, April 4, 2013

March 22, 2013 - PM - Communicative Approaches/Arabic/Other


Easy Collaborative Learning Activities for a Student-Centered Classroom, By Serena Chu, Laney College. Submitted by Jenell Beever-Powell 

Collaborative learning has many benefits for students. It creates a student-centered classroom where learners not only develop communication skills but also social interaction skills. It also addresses different learning styles and establishes an environment of cooperation. This kind of learning reduces anxiety, fosters faster critical thinking and students learn more quickly. Plus, it's fun!
 

A few of the activities were the Three-Step Interview (Student A interviews B then the pair shares the info with another pair); a Jigsaw;Think-Pair-Share; a KWL chart (very good for pre-reading); Inner-Outer Circles; Give One, Get One (Students fold a paper into 9 squares. Students then write down one piece of info they know about the topic in each square but do not fill in all the squares. Students then mingle and discuss what they know with their classmates. As they gather info, they fill in other squares.); and Gallery Walk (In groups, Ss discuss and respond to photo or quotation on poster boards. Hang posters on wall. Ss are given sticky notes. They peruse the "gallery", responding to their classmates with comments written on sticky notes. Students return to original poster and read/discuss comments. Follow up by students choosing one quotation/photo and doing a journal writing on it for homework.)

  
Stephanie Owens and Rebecca Guler
Effective Academic Intervention for Arabic Speakers. Presented by Rebecca Guler and Stephanie Owens. Submitted by VirginiaDelgado.Your takeaway:Any class with Arabic speakers can be an opportunity to develop needed metacognitive skills.

For discussion, the presenters presented summaries to consider:

--Saudi students who begin at lower levels are more likely to fail. Therefore, beginners need more intervention. In particular, they lack literacy and phonetic knowledge.
--Elicit and discuss their problems and solutions with them

Also, share and model successful problem-solving strategies. For example:  How would you approach this? If I were you...

You will likely see handwriting issues. These can be a symptom of problems with
--reading comprehension
--notetaking skills
--inability to keep up in listening speed

Discuss with your students what may be going on and help them compensate, or adjust teaching.

Help for reading comprehension difficulties: have students read short  passages with questions that are similar to questions in tests to help them prepare for final exams. Give them a goal for time: finish this reading in 15 minutes. Next time, 10 minutes. Work with detail questions: Arabic users excel in inference and gift but struggle with the detail level.

Metacognition is also an issue: they "don't know what they don't know." lead related discussions about what they need to learn and why.  Give study skills surveys with questions such as (give a continuum going from never to always):
--I bring a pencil to class
--I turn my phone off
--I take notes
--I ask when I don't understand
--I re-write my notes at home

Exit tickets: Before students leave the class, have them reflect to 'get out of class":  Reflections: what worked? What didn't work? What has been difficult?  One thing you learned that has been useful. One thing you are still not sure about.

Exam reflection: return essays with a questionnaire: where did you lost the most points? What section was easy for you? do you need to change your strategy? What word did you misspell most often?

Contact smatson@els.edu if you would like a copy of the powerpoint for Stephanie and Rebecca's presentation


Crossing Orthographies: Strategies for Improving Literacy in Arabic L1 ELLs. Presenters: Amanda Lanier Temples and Kimberly Kleiber, Georgia State University. Submitted by Ellie Leith

This very interesting session focused on issues faced by Arabic L1 learners when moving from writing (and reading) Arabic to English. With the recent increace of Arab student enrollments at US IEPs, it is timely and useful for our ELS program to understand why these learners have some of the specific difficulties that challenge them, and some precise ways in which to assist them even better with their language learning challenges.

The presentation began with a discussion of common problems instructors have noticed with Arabic L1 ELLs: spelling...especially using vowels, handwriting that doesn't stay 'on the line', and using the 'be' verb. The speaker went on to share some basics about Arabic which explain some of these problems. For example, in some Arabic orthographies, vowels are implied in writing; this explains why they often have such a difficult time using the correct vowels and why they seem to focus on the consonants more. The speaker equated this idea to Americans dropping vowels in situations such as text messaging ('thx', 'bfr', 'bcz'). According to the speaker, handwriting in Arabic has more freedom in artistic expression (moving above or below the line may be acceptable in some situations). The speaker also shared that the 'be' verb (in the present tense, specifically) is problematic for Arabic L1 ELLs because they simply don't use this verb in the present tense in the same way English speakers do. For example, in Arabic the sentence "I in the room" would be perfectly fine; the 'am' is implied in this situation and explains why these learners often need lots of work with the 'be' verb(she is, he is, we are, I am...etc.) as it may seem redundant or unnecessary to them.
This was an amazing session! I can't wait to learn more about how to help our large groups of Arabic speakers succeed in learning English.

Motivation and the Vision of Knowing a Second Language. Presented by Zoltan Dornyei, University of Nottingham. Submitted by Dan Manolescu
What attracted me to this presentation was the fact that, approximately half hour before it started,  Professor Dornyei was in front of the lectern, surrounded by several attendees, and welcoming everybody who entered the hall. The person who introduced him said that this was the equivalent of the keynote speech. And indeed it was…
The speaker began his outstanding presentation by joking about his accent and mentioned that vision is everywhere. After a quick definition, he gave us a quotation:
“If you can imagine it, you can achieve it. If you can dream it, you can become it.” (William Arthur Ward, 1921-1991)
According to Dornyei, in order to succeed in the ESL world, students and teachers are looking at three necessary ingredients: motivation, vision, and the individual. The L2 motivation has its own set of rules: the learner’s internal desire, social pressure, and the actual experience. Most teachers use the word goal but the presenter preferred vision because there is slight difference.  If you are an athlete and you want to go the Olympics, you have a goal, but if you already see yourself on the podium, you are talking about vision. The last, but not least, Dornyei says we should also pay special attention to each student individually because everybody is a separate entity.



 



 








 






 

Monday, April 1, 2013

March 21, 2013 - Evening: Party Photos!!


CELEBRATION!

Thursday night was a joyous one, as nineteen  2013 Teaching Excellence Award winners came together to be honored at a special dinner, and celebrated for their contributions to their centers.  Teachers of Excellence are those who are nominated by their Academic Directors for strong student survey results, exceptional teamwork, excellent teaching, and work above and beyond expectation. Our hard-working, creative and committed instructors are:

Jenelle Beever-Powell, Toronto;  Amy Broadsword, Portland; Ann Rose, Toronto (unable  to attend and represented byTammy Cameron), Maria Catamero, Manhattan; Virginia Delgado, Bristol;  Brenda Ellingbow, St. Paul; Christina Grillo, New Haven; Brenda Hager, Thousand Oaks; Ariel Haughton, Pittsburgh; Ellie Leith, Pocatello;  Mona Makhlouf, Tampa; Chelsea Maney, DeKalb; Jessica McKay, St. Louis;  Susan Posh, Miami Shores;  Heather Ranier, Oklahoma City;  Jesse Sauer, Oklahoma City; Yvette Rieser, Oklahoma City;  Jennifer Townsend, Houston; Katherine Vernezze, Milwaukee; and Alicia McMillan, St. Petersburg (unable to attend).

Jaime Haile and her graduate-forum poster on self-identity
It has also been a banner year for ELS participation at TESOL!  ELS was proud to have the following 23 individuals presenting in 19 sessions, either singly or with other staff:

--Amelia Adams, Berkeley: "Decked Out: Using Cards to Create Flexible Communicative Activities."
--Marsha Appling-Nunez, Cleveland:  "Achieving Oral Fluency with Dynamic PechaKucha Prezis."(Electronic Village)
--Zita Bodonyi, Plymouth: "Using the Indexing Feature in Microsoft Word to Track Vocabulary Usage." (Electronic Village)
--Beth Crumpler, Fredericksburg: "ESL Instruction: Develop Your Skills to Become a Master Conductor."
--Rebecca Guler, Houston/Clear Lake, with Stephanie Owens, New Haven: "Effective Academic Interventions with Arabic Speaking English Language Learners."
--Rebecca Guler, Houston/Clear Lake: "Eye Openers: 1-Hour Classroom Exchanges between ESL and American Students." (poster)
--Jaime Haile, Thousand Oaks: "Fostering a Positive Self-Identification in Bi/Multicultural Individuals."
--Cary Hitchcock, Nashville: "Effective Correction in Form-Focused Instruction."
--Jeff Hutcheson, PHQ: "Hot Topics in Enrollment, Viss, SEVP, and Advocacy for IEPs."
--Tammy Johnson, LaVerne: "Mac 1-2: Leveraging Google Docs to Ensure Smooth Communication." (Electronic Village)
--Tammy Johnson, LaVerne: "How Explicit Grammar Instruction Affects Student Writing." (Poster)
--Cheryl Jones, Johnson City, with Amber Young, Grand Rapids:  "From Intervention to Motivation: Reviewing and Improving the Quality of Teacher-Made Assessments."
--Anna-Marie Keleman, Rachel Redfield, and Stephanie Kim, LaVerne: "Assumed Computer Knowledge of Saudi Students."(Electronic Village)
--Stephanie Kim, Rachel Redfield, and Anna-Marie Kelemen, LaVerne: "CALL for Novice ESL Students." (Electronic Village)
--Rus Kiser, with Jesse Sauer, Oklahoma City:  "Text-Rich Classrooms While on the Move."
--Shannon Law, with Christina Grillo, New Haven: "Authentic Language Learning Activities that Counter the Affective Filter."
--Susan Matson, PHQ (co-presenting with 13 others): "Learning Disabilities." In: Language Teaching Insights, forthcoming publication by TESOL: publication preview.
--Rachel Redfield, Stephanie Kim, and Anna-Marie Keleman, LaVerne: "Mac 7-8: One Teacher's Journey from a Techno-Dummy to an Able User." (Electronic Village)
--Dreah Stratton, San Diego:  A Fresh Look at Articulatory Setting and Intelligibility."
--Amanda Yousef-Little, Miami Shores:  "Asymmetric-Symmetric Sentential Conjugation."

In addition, Rus Kiser attended as president-elect of Oklahoma TESOL, while Nathan Clements (Fredericksburg) came as head of the TESOL employee concerns committee. Zack Hausrath of Lubbock and Amber Young of Grand Rapids represented ELS as site reviewers in training at a workshop conducted by CEA, the major IEP accrediting body.  Other welcome additions to the party included Dallas A.D. Bryan Harsar and his teaching staff; the CAB members (see March 19 listing), Jeff Hucheson, Assistant Director, U.S. Operations;  of Ward Morrow, Director of Academic Affairs; Terri Rapoport, Director of Curriculum and Development; Mary Christianson, Director of Academic Technology, and Susan Matson, Director of Teacher Training.

Rebecca Guler, Houston-Clear Lake, and other partygoers





Instructor Maria Catamero and AD Dan
Manolescu of ELS/Manhattan
                                     




Director of Acacdemic Technology Mary Christianson
A.D.s Cheryl Jonese and Amber Young

Terri Rapoport, Director of Curriculum (seated), and (left to right) Stephanie Owens, New Haven (presenter);
 Ruse Kiser, OKC (incoming president, OKTESOL); Nathan Clements, Fredericksburg (TESOL employee concerns); Bryan Harsar, Dallas AD.



 

March 22, 2013 - A.M.: Grammar/Speaking


REPEAT AFTER ME: Reconceptualizing  Repetition. By Sandra Silberstein and Diane Larsen Freeman (scm)
Your takeaway: Don't be afraid to do short repetitive drills: they may be just what your beginners need.
Sandra – for decades, wewanting to rethink audiolingualism. One of her teacher trainees recently said to her that  she (trainee)  didn’t think she was allowed to do choral work any more. Is there still a place for this?   In 1972 , Silberstein and Freeman were graduate school students at Michigan. The Rainbow books were still around and drilled students. Michigan and Georgetown were the hubs of audiolingualism. Sandra now does critical discourse of war and other issues; Diane is into reading and grammar. The audience was shown a 1950's era ALM videoclip which caused all to cringe due to the excessive repetition required of students. Definitely out!
However, Sandra's experience in attempting to learn chants for the Torah made her realize that in some cases, it's very hard for studentsto reproduce language correctly without a good role model (the teacher). Drills can be effective after all. Diane explained this by detailing how complexity theory works.  Diane found drills useful while in the Peace Corps in Malaysia when she varied drills while needed.  How do drills work? Through behaviorism: it leads to habit formation through overlearning. Also, auatomaticity helps develop fluency. When language is automatic, students don't need to broker, or think about, language.
 
Decked Out: Using Cards to Create Flexible Communicative Grammar Activities, presented by Amelia Adams (ELS). Submitted by Brenda Winch (reprising a similar session done at the Houston Center)
Your takeaway: this kind of "mixer"activity is a great way to make grammar come alive for students.
 
Amelia presented on using verb cards (ex. “bake bread” or “take a bath”) for various classroom activities. The activity that Amelia had us try out was a mingle using the question form and short answers in the present perfect. First, we each drew a card from the verb card box and mentally formed a present perfect question about life experience: “Have you ever (baked bread)?” Second, we were instructed to look around the room for another teacher whom we thought would say “Yes, I have.” If that teacher answered in the affirmative, the question-asking teacher got to keep the card for 1 point and could then draw another (and repeat). Because we were “advanced” teachers, Amelia also had us ask 3 follow up questions. For example, “When did you bake bread? Who taught you how to bake bread? Was the bread tasty?” After we all settled down from the activity, we were put into pairs and told to create an activity using the cards that we could actually use in our classes this session. We came up with so many creative ideas! These cards are a reusable source for endless activities. It was a wonderful In-Service!


Of course, choice of which materials to drill on is important. Diane showed graphs of which verbs are the most frequent in English: learning these, and learning them well, makes a real difference. Language processing in all domains is very sensitive to frequency of occurence. In language learning, you take the resources (words) you have, and through repeated "soft assemblies", complex systems evolve.  In any case, true repetition doesn't exist: context and pronunciation varies. The value of that variability is that it allows humans to maintain their own distinctiveness and accommodate that of others. This is the social reward of repetition.  the conclusion of both presenters: repetition doesn't mean we are seeking perfectionism. We should expect some variation, and the act of repetition itself creates the foundation for many acceptable possibilities
 

Effects of Self-Monitoring and Correction on ESL Learners’ Oral Performance, presented by Nicholas Velde, Yuan Zhuang, and Okim Kang, Northern Arizona University. Submitted by Ward Morrow.
Your takeway: If you want students to effectively self-correct, your guidance is essential! 

I was drawn to this session because of the emphasis on self-monitoring and correction.  The abstract immediately made me think of the effort ELS has undertaken in developing new writing rubrics and TAGs.  It seemed from the abstract that the team from Northern Arizona University was employing similar principles of self-correction in oral performance that ELS is employing in our writing TAGs.  I knew that since we were looking at different skills, speaking vs. writing, a true apples-to-apples comparison might not be likely.  However, I was curious to see if any potential nexus existed that might be of value.
 

The study involved two heterogeneous groups of ESL students from China and Saudi Arabia.  Both groups received the same instruction in speaking over a 16-week ESL course.  The experimental group, however, had the opportunity to review and critique their oral presentations at home, by watching their presentations on Youtube.  The control group did not have the opportunity to self-evaluate by watching videos of their presentations at home.  Instructors used detailed evaluation rubrics to assess four presentations from each student throughout the 16-week session.  Each presentation was evaluated in terms of presentation skills, oral proficiency, and pronunciation. 

The team conducted this study on three separate occasions.  In the first 16-week study, the team found little improvement by the experimental group over the control group in any of the three categories.  In the second 16-week study, the team found a wider, yet still relatively small, difference between the experimental group and the control group in terms of oral proficiency.  In the final 16-week experiment, the team found that the oral proficiency of the experimental group showed marked improvement over that of the control group.  Differences, however, in pronunciation and “presentation skills” did not show significant differences.  

Why did the three studies show differing results each time, with the oral proficiency of the experimental group improving more with each study?  The answer is relatively simple:  guidance.  In the first study, the team had the experimental group watch their presentations at home in the evening and offer a self critique.  However, the students received no guidance from their instructors in what to look for as they did the critique. 

In the second study, the team gave the experimental group more input on what to look for as the students critiqued themselves.  In the third study, the experimental group received the most specific and concrete guidelines on what to look for.  With these concrete guidelines, the experimental group was most apt to see the problems with their oral performance and engage in self-corrective strategies. 

Concrete guidance was the nexus I was hoping to find between the study of oral performance, and the use of writing TAGs at ELS.  As the study showed, oral performance did not improve simply by watching one’s own presentation.  It was only when students were given specific guidelines in what to look for that they were able to clearly identify problems and self-correct in future presentations.  Thus, their oral performance improved.  This is exactly what ELS is hoping to see through the use of TAGs:  Consistently raising students’ awareness of specific achievement goals will give students the ability, over time, to identify errors in writing and self-correct.  The result will be better writing. 

Will the ELS TAGs have the same effect of improving writing as this study showed with self-evaluation of oral skills?  Only time will tell.  However, the presentation left me feeling very optimistic that are on the right track to improving writing skills.



Creating and Choosing the Best Materials for Speaking and Pronunciation.  Presented by Marsha Chan, Judy Gilbert, Tamara Jones, and Steve Jones. Submitted by Stephanie Owens  Our takeaway: You can touch pronunciation in any course—and should.
This panel of speakers shared materials and techniques for teaching pronunciation.  An interesting part of the presentation was that they all focused on teaching “the prosody package,” which includes word stress, speech groups, rhythm, focus, linking, and intonation.  This was rather new for me because I’ve always focused more on minimal pairs, short/long vowels, etc. 
Judy Gilbert’s portion of the presentation really focused on the value of emphasizing prosody.
Tamara Jones spent the most time outlining activities that can be done with just about any exercise in any book; she used pages from All Clear 2, Azar Grammar, Longman TOEFL and Headway.  I liked this a lot because she showed that you don’t have to devote an entire course on pronunciation.  Some techniques:
Word Stress·         Teach word stress at the same time you teach vocabulary.  Ask students to sort words into stress groups (another exposure to vocab).

  o

Oo

oO

Ooo

Box

table

suggest

envelope

·         Choral Repetition (aka Drills)
o   Use body movements to emphasize stress
§  Stretch an elastic
§  Open your arms
§  Stand up
§  Open your hands
                        Give a speaking quiz in which the students have to pronounce the stress correctly
Speech Groups
§  Break a reading text into thought chunks – this is useful for long texts with complex sentences, like TOEFL readings.    e.g.  Yesterday/I went/to the store. 
§  Sentence matching by thought group (It’s frightening     ….  to walk alone at night
§  Slashing Practice – read a text aloud and insert the slash with a dramatic arm movement and corresponding sound effect 
 
Rhythm
§  Mark stress in sentences and drill accordingly

o   Example from Azar exercise on can/can’t

§  A cat can climb trees, but it can’t fly. 

§  Clap out the stressed words in a sentence, then add in the “garbage grammar words” --- notice how the stress and speed of the sentence doesn’t change.

§  Class really fun (3 claps) à This class is really fun. (Still 3 claps)

§  Have students make a recording, transcribe, and mark the stress.  Then compare with a native speakers markings. 
Linking

§  Mark links in vocab/idiomatic expression

o   Hold on à Hol  don

§  Listen to songs and mark the linked words

Intonation
Tamara pointed out that this is one of the least corrected mistakes, but can be the mistake that most negatively affects communication.  Example – a store clerk who says, “Please come again” with flat intonation doesn’t send the intended message. 

§  Mark intonation in pragmatic dialogues
o   Sorry I’m late. 

§  Choral repetition
o   Can use kazoos/humming to emphasize the tone over the meaning
o   Teacher acts as a conductor to emphasis intonation

§  Mirroring Project
o   Students select a 2-3 minute YouTube clip

§  Transcribe it
§  Mark the intonation
§  Memorize it
§  Act it out
§  Video tape
 
·         Tips:  Don’t use cartoons, screen the clips for inappropriate scenes language, and have students choose to mirror speakers of the same gender.
Marsha Chan also presented on similar activities and shared her YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/PronunciationDoctor
 
 
A fresh look at articulatory setting and intelligibility, by Dreah Stratton (ELS/San Diego) and Dr. rich Robison. Submitted by Dreah Stratton.

Dr. Robison briefly reviewed the development of the articulatory setting construct and the elements that constitute it and explained how articulatory setting is instrumental both to accent and intelligibility. I presented practical classroom techniques for incorporating articulatory setting into pronunciation instruction, from raising students' awareness via video clips, to videotaping them speaking English and their L1, to compare their mouth movement, and to practice articulator stretch exercises. Finally I reported the survey results from my class regarding the articulatory setting techniques and its relation to improving pronunciation, which were very positive.

 

 

March 21, 2013 - A.M.: Posters, Session List, Vocabulary

Jaime Haile (right) and a visitor
Carrie Woods
POSTER SESSIONS
ELS was proud to have several staff presenting poster sessions at TESOL this year. In one particular poster session, Tammy Johnson, LaVerne, discussed the implications of explicit grammar instruction, and  Carrie Woods showcased "Creating ESL Newsletters",giving many examples of successful student work.  Jaime Haile of Thousand Oaks also explained her presentation, "Fostering a Positive Self-Identity in Bi-Multicultural Individuals," to a convention-goer.

 Jaime is one of five ELS staff now pursuing a Masters degree through the ELS collaboration with Adelphi University in New York.  Jaime's poster discussed challenges and coping strategies for bi- and multicultural individuals developing identifies. Conclusion: "those with high identity integration have high levels of success in their academic endeavors and optimism about their professional futures."


ACADEMIC SESSIONS
For a list of most notable academic sessions throughout TESOL 2013, see this link:
http://www.tesol.org/convention2013/education-schedule/academic-sessions

GAMES
Mona Maklouf, Tampa instructor, reports on a number of icebreakers and games that will serve to motivate students and get them eager to use English. For a copy of her associated powerpoint, write smatson@els.edu.  A sample activity:

Call on students at random to be in the spotlight. The student gets 30 seconds to share/open up about any of the following:
--A proverb that they know, and what it means
--The best moment of my life (depending on the student: possibly the worst moment, as well)
--The best decision I ever made
--What the past/present/future means to me

If time allows, have more than one student do this, to break the ice!  Spending the first 5-8 minutes of class on this (it's best for SSP) is a good motivator for getting students to arrive on time.

VOCABULARY

Practical Ideas for Learning Vocabulary. Keith Folse, University of Southern Florida. (scm)
Your takeaway: Gagne is better than Bloom for vocabulary learning. Always keep these nine tips in mind!

Most ESL practioners know about Bloom's areas of learning: knowledge, comprehension, application, synthesis, and evaluation. However, Gagne's nine "events of instruction" can be more helpful in terms of helping studain attentionents make meaningful connections with vocabulary and to retain what they've learned.  Folse's very entertaining and memorable presentation stated:

1. First, gain attention. Use red markers on the board if necessary. Pose questions. Attention is essential!
2. Stimulate recall of prior knowledge. What do they already know about the word or its context? Explore and elicit knowledge.
3. Present the material to be used. As you explain, have students fill in a grid - going from smallest to largest, for example, or some other continuum that they can relate to - or otherwise have them perform a task to process what you are saying.
4. Describe the goal. This helps students frame the information ("Ah! I can use this in engineering and around the house...")
5. Provide guidance for learning. For example, an acronym might help, or a chart, or a chant. Teach mnemonics where useful. "Our job is to make it seem manageable at all times."
6. Elicit performance. Students must do as much as possible with the words: speak, write, think, compare, share.  Idea: "Can you find two words on the board that mean the opposite of each other? What are they? How are they spelled?"
7. Provide feedback.  Are they using the word correctly?  Are they pronouncing the words right? Be objective. Avoid "good/bad" judgements.  Be factual.
8.  Assess performance. This could be by means of a quiz, but also with open-ended quizzes the same or the next day using the target words.
9. Enhance retention and transfer.  Don't expect vocabulary to show up immediately in writing. The environment for production has to be simliar to the environment that they learned the words in. For example, if they learned a word in the context of a story, you might have them stand up and summarize the story, putting a check mark on the board every time they used the target vocabulary (or have another student put the checks on the board). Or--do a dictation, have students recite a poem - anything that requires them to remember, process, and produce the word again. The more exposures, the better - always.

But wait, you may be saying. These steps are very similiar to what we do in ELS lesson plans! Yes - and that's why the lesson plans work!  They focus, at all times, on the student outcomes.


Anchoring Academic Word List Vocabulary One Touch at a Time. Presenters:  Bill Acton, Mike Burri, Karen Rauser, Brian Teaman. Submitted by Amy Broadsword.
Your takeaway: Use kinesthetic activities for vocabulary teaching. They enhance understanding and pronunciation.

I have followed Bill Acton's work in kinaesthetic pronunciation and haptics over the past few years, so I was delighted to attend this session.  His team demonstrated how the use of haptics, the involvement of movement and resonance, could assist language learners in true learning of whole vocabulary.  A word is more than just its meaning; to truly know a word, one must know its properties such as stress, pronunciation, syllabification, collocations and prosodic features.  Attendees watched a demonstration of haptic anchoring (movement and touch) where the presenters used various gestures and movements to represent stressed and unstressed vowels (using their "vowel clock"), syllabification, intonation and stress shift across word families.  In groups, we were given words to practice these movements.  The methodology behind this approach is to provide

  • More effective ways of integrating new or improved pronunciation into spontaneous speech 
  • More systematic use of kinaesthetic/body engagement in pronunciation/vocabulary teaching 
  • Improved self-monitoring and self-correction
  • Better integration of pronunciation teaching in the curriculum and classroom

I encourage you to visit Acton's website and peruse his publications on this subject to watch a demonstration and stretch your creativity when it comes to helping a student truly learn vocabulary.

http://hipoeces.blogspot.com/

http://hapticpronunciationteaching.blogspot.ca/

video demonstration:  http://vimeo.com/60271213

 

 

March 20, 2013 - Evening: Plenary/Technology

John HunterOccasionally, the TESOL planners surprise us by giving us a plenary speaker outside of our field, but with a major message to consider. That was absolutely the case with John Hunter, whose fame has been growing in public education circles ever since he gave his popular TED talk on his World Peace Game. He is now a celebrated speaker throughout the U.S.

See:  http://www.ted.com/talks/john_hunter_on_the_world_peace_game.html

Although Hunter's primary teaching area is elementary school, his game for getting learners to think about how nations can collaborate for peaceful ends, despite lots of temptations to do otherwise, his lessons would be valuable for adult ESL learners as well.  But turning his ideas into an SEC or workshop for ELS may have to wait: one must take a Master Teacher's class to learn the specifics of his game.  In the meantime, his parting words at the plenary session were memorable: "Never forget that whoever we are - whatever classes we teach - we can all make an impact. We can all make a difference."

TECHNOLOGY NOTES

So much was available by way of educational technology this year that it's impossible to summarize all the exciting key ideas here. A few from the Electronic Village and Electronic Showcase are listed below. Also, Tammy Cameron from Toronto found lots of great ideas, especially those that involved photos for learning, at a session on Mobile English by two Brazilian presenters. Information:
http://mthatlearning.blogspot.comhttp://iftheshipsinks.blogspot.com   Major sessions on classroom tools are below.

--Effective Vocabulary Building with Quizlet and Flashcards Deluxe, James Broadbridge, Oberlin University. jrb@obirin.ac.jp
--Creating Authentic Listening Activities By Using Authentic Listening Materials. U. Bumandalai, BYU, b.udambor@gmail.com
--Academic Blogfolio: The role of Technological Literacy in IEP Students' Academic Success. IUP. ananym6@gmail.com
--Technology and Culture Integration Models for Improving Listening/Speaking Skills. SNHU. Lyra Riabov.  l.riabov@snhu.edu
--How Prezi Promotes Student Reading Comprehension. SungAe Kim, OCU, skim@my.okcu.edu
--Glogster: A Creative and Dynamic Web Tool for Interactive Posters. Mabel Ortiz. Universidad Catolica. mortiz@ucsc.cl
--Corpus Based Tools in the ESL/EFL Classroom. Magdi Kandil, ASU, mkandil@astate.edu
--Sharing a Way to Combat Plagiarism in an ESL Class. Christine Sabieh. Notre Dame University.  sabieh@hotmail.com

Using Technology in the Classroom, submitted by Jessica Mckay
Your takeway: "Change is only hard the first time you do it"--your students might love these waves of the future!

The most beneficial presentation that I attended was, “Mobile Devices and Language Learning”. In this session, two presenters worked together to demonstrate the usefulness of mobile devices in today’s classroom. They specifically mentioned engaging students with technology. The presenters said that instead of “fighting” cell phones and other devices used by students, we should harness their abilities and use them to our advantage. The presentation itself was very engaging because we were asked to use our own cellphones to participate while the presenter demonstrated using her own Ipad. I found the presentation both interesting and useful. Although there may initially be some resistance, I cannot wait to try the following ideas:

· “Poll Everywhere “ is a website that can be used in class. Teachers create a poll online. Then, in class students can text their answers to various questions. The website shows results in real time, so the teacher knows how many students are actually participating and how many of them get the answer correct
· Create QR codes for worksheets or activities –students can scan the QR code to gain access and then save the information.
· Use cell phones to go on “Photo Hunts” - Students can take pictures that represent vocabulary words and then present their findings to the class.
· For any class, students can create short video clips and present them to the class-this can be less daunting than speaking in front of the class.
· For grammar/content teaching, students can type answers into google documents – this way they create their own answer, read others’ answers, and potentially learn from their own/others’ mistakes
· “Popplet” and “Lino” can be used to make notes more interactive and helpful – students’ teachers can add comments to what others have created
· “Evernote” and “DropBox” can be used to curate information individually or as a class
· “Research Races” in which students can use the internet, dictionaries, etc to find the answer to various questions
· Students/Teachers can create their own apps, games, etc.
· Voice Recognition/Text to Type can be used to practice pronunciation and speaking.
· Etc, etc, etc, - there were a multitude of interesting ideas!

Although change can be uncomfortable, it is often necessary. In today’s world, we cannot escape technology. Although mobile devices are a distraction, they are also beneficial. I plan to attempt a few of these interactivities in my own classroom because, as the presenter mentioned, “The more ways students access their brain, the more they learn.”